<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Community of the Risen &#187; Book of John</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dkam136.com/tag/book-of-john/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dkam136.com</link>
	<description>a place for the church to be the risen entity it was meant to be.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nicodemus and Jesus &#8211; Part One</title>
		<link>http://dkam136.com/2006/01/23/nicodemus-and-jesus-part-one/</link>
		<comments>http://dkam136.com/2006/01/23/nicodemus-and-jesus-part-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book of John]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coldfire.wordpress.com/2006/01/23/nicodemus-and-jesus-part-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He doesn’t get an introduction like many people in today’s world.  The only introduction we get to Nicodemus is that he is “a member of the Jewish ruling council.”  The world Pharisee means “separate ones” and probably meant that Nicodemus was a “ruler of a synagogue” (From “Lexical Aids to the New Testament).  Nicodemus was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="3">He doesn’t get an introduction like many people in today’s world.  The only introduction we get to Nicodemus is that he is “a member of the Jewish ruling council.”  The world Pharisee means “separate ones” and probably meant that Nicodemus was a “ruler of a synagogue” (From “Lexical Aids to the New Testament).  Nicodemus was a man in power at the time of Jesus.  At this point in time we don’t know Nicodemus’ motive for visiting Jesus. <br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">We only know what Nicodemus refers to Jesus as: Rabbi.  Nicodemus’ first words should give us a clue as to who Nicodemus thought Jesus was: teacher.  First and foremost he uses the word “teacher” to describe Jesus.  He then goes on to qualify this statement saying that he knows not only that Jesus is a teacher but a “teacher come from God.”  He then qualifies this saying that “no one could perform the miraculous signs” Jesus was doing if “God were not with him.” <br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">This may seem only preliminary flattery from a Jewish leader, but it is more than this and must be seen as such because Jesus will subtly use this later in the passage and again John will hint at it in chapter four.  There are three logical progressions that Nicodemus goes through to get where he is at thus far:<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">(1)</font>   <font size="3">Jesus is a teacher (“rabbi”)<br />
</font><font size="3">(2)</font>   <font size="3">Jesus is teacher sent from God<br />
</font><font size="3">(3)</font>   <font size="3">We know that Jesus is from God because of his signs<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">We might come up with a fourth logical progression inferring from Nicodemus saying that:<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">(4)</font>   <font size="3">A great teacher from God <em>must </em>perform signs in order to be validated.<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">This, argued responsibly, would seem in line with Torah and with the Jewish Testament (i.e. “old testament”).  If we understand Jesus as a “new Moses” then we can go back and compare the Exodus to this moment here.  That is that the people were living in slavery in need of redemption.  In order to show that Moses is from Yahweh he is given signs me must complete.  Reading through them we find such things as Moses’ staff turning into a snake (Exodus 4) and the ten plagues (Exodus 7-11).  All of these things deal with signs from God in order to validate Moses. <br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">Thus the next thing that Jesus says seems strange.  Jesus simply states that “no one can see the Kingdom of God unless he is born again.”  It doesn’t seem to flow with Nicodemus’ thought.  It’s not everyday that we walk up to meet someone and they give us an answer similar to the one that Jesus gave.  Here there are two questions that jump up right away:<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">(1)</font>   <font size="3">What does it mean to “see” the Kingdom of God?<br />
</font><font size="3">(2)</font>   <font size="3">What does it mean to be “born again?”<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">These questions, hopefully, will be answered clearly enough by Jesus himself in the verses to come.  Nicodemus asks the question that we all have just asked, “How can a man be born when he is old?”  He then goes on making a statement invalidating the question.  “Surely” he says “He cannot enter a second time into his mother’s womb to be born!”  Let us be clear from the outset, Nicodemus here is simply stating the obvious: It’s impossible to “born again.”  Jesus sounds a bit “off his rocker” at the present moment, either completely crazy or talking in far fetched metaphors that Nicodemus does not yet grasp. <br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">But there may also be more to Nicodemus’ answer that we cannot find at first glance.  Barclay points out that a Jew would understand that “this as not an idea which was in the least strange to people who heard it in New Testament times.  The Jew knew about rebirth.  When a man from another faith became a Jew and had been accepted into Judaism by prayer and sacrifice and baptism, he was regarded as being <em>reborn.</em>”</font><a name="_ftnref1"></a>[1]<font size="3">  The Rabbi’s would often say, “A proselyte who embraces Judaism is like a new-born child.”<br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">Jesus goes on again stating that he is telling “the truth.”  Notice this time he switches the word “see” for “enter” the kingdom of heaven.  He also qualifies being born again by saying we must be “born of water and spirit.”  Just as “flesh gives birth to flesh” so “the spirit gives birth to spirit.”  In other words, we are all born by “flesh.”  Jesus is saying that we must also now have a “spirit birth” or a “second birth.” <br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">Then he goes on to say that “you should not be surprised at my [Jesus’] saying you must be born again.”  This is to say that Jesus thought his message was totally and fully <em>expected.</em>  Jesus is saying that this second birth is the <em>natural</em> way of living for Israel.  That is, that it is the most natural thing in the world to be born of this spirit.  He goes on to qualify what it means to be born of the spirit by comparing it to the wind.  Everyone born of the spirit is like this wind because we cannot “tell were it comes from or where it is going.” <br />
</font><font size="3"> </font></p>
<p><font size="3">This is an important message to Nicodemus and, consequently, an important part of the passage for us to understand.  Jesus is saying that we can here the “sound” of the spirit, but we don’t know where it is coming from or where it is going.  The spirit “blows wherever it pleases” and we don’t see it.  In other words, Jesus is providing a direct answer indirectly to Nicodemus.  He is telling Nicodemus that one cannot understand the way this rebirth works because it is the work of God.  The spirit cannot be contained by an idea or a doctrine. <br />
</font></p>
<div><font size="3"><br />
<hr align="left" width="33%" size="1" /></font>  </p>
<div><a name="_ftn1"></a>[1]<font face="Times New Roman" size="2"> William Barclay, Commentary on John, 126</font></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dkam136.com/2006/01/23/nicodemus-and-jesus-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Studying in the Theology library</title>
		<link>http://dkam136.com/2006/01/21/studying-in-the-theology-library/</link>
		<comments>http://dkam136.com/2006/01/21/studying-in-the-theology-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book of John]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coldfire.wordpress.com/2006/01/21/studying-in-the-theology-library/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I spent two and a half hours in the theology library studying the background to the book of John.  I have to write a seven to ten pager on a text of my choosing for my “Studying and Teaching the Bible” class.  The information is so interesting and fresh.  Hopefully I will be able [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="3">Today I spent two and a half hours in the theology library studying the background to the book of John.  I have to write a seven to ten pager on a text of my choosing for my “Studying and Teaching the Bible” class.  The information is so interesting and fresh.  Hopefully I will be able to spend a considerable amount of time tomorrow night studying up (two hours in the library only wet my appetite).  I worked tonight up until 12:30 and now I’m at home trying to get ready for bed, resting my thoughts for the night.  Hope</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dkam136.com/2006/01/21/studying-in-the-theology-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doing Life Together</title>
		<link>http://dkam136.com/2005/12/24/doing-life-together/</link>
		<comments>http://dkam136.com/2005/12/24/doing-life-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book of John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gospel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coldfire.wordpress.com/2005/12/24/doing-life-together/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi.  I just wanted to let those people who read my blog know that it was never my intention to get into a fist fight over the book of John with Brad (see the other posts for more information).  My intention has always and will always be to dialogue with others about the Christian faith.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  I just wanted to let those people who read my blog know that it was never my intention to get into a fist fight over the book of John with Brad (see the other posts for more information).  My intention has always and will always be to dialogue with others about the Christian faith.  I purposely left my last blog post open ended in order to bring about dialogue about it.  Life is about more than finding &#8220;right answers&#8221; and then defending them.  Life is about learning to understand and approach things from multiple points of view.  So here&#8217;s the deal, I&#8217;m going to spend the next two to three weeks attempting to understand John 3 and 4 in context of the rest of the book of John.  I will post it when I think I&#8217;m finished.  Please pray that the Spirit of God would move as I attempt to undertake such a hefty load of work.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dkam136.com/2005/12/24/doing-life-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading Passages Out of Context</title>
		<link>http://dkam136.com/2005/12/22/reading-passages-out-of-context/</link>
		<comments>http://dkam136.com/2005/12/22/reading-passages-out-of-context/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book of John]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coldfire.wordpress.com/2005/12/22/reading-passages-out-of-context/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I was talking with Brad again about John again.  He quoted a number of snippets of verses from John and 1 John and dealt at length with my last post.  It is my observation that a lot of Christians in America tend to take snippets of three to five verses and make doctrines out of them.  Let [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I was talking with <a href="http://www.brokenmessenger.com/">Brad</a> again about John again.  He quoted a number of snippets of verses from John and 1 John and dealt at length with my last post.  It is my observation that a lot of Christians in America tend to take snippets of three to five verses and make doctrines out of them.  Let me give you an example.  Brad quoted John 3:36:</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the son will not see life, for God&#8217;s wrath abides on him.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is a common passage quoted by conservative evangelicals to support their position.  But what it lacks is context.  It lacks understand of the  chapters around them.  If they are really interested in &#8220;contex&#8221; as they speak of it, they would have understood first, that this is John the Baptist speaking.  If one reads it, it is talking those who have noticed more people are going to Jesus.  John proclaims that he &#8220;me must become less&#8221; in light of this.</p>
<p>This passage, then, should focus on the humility of John.  If we are to interpret it for ourselves today, we too should be come less and allow ourselves to enter into the reign of God where it is not about us, but it is about God.  Just as it was then, God has given Jesus &#8220;the spirit without limit&#8221; and &#8220;placed everything in his hands.&#8221;  That is, that Jesus has all authority on heaven and earth, as he has said in other places. </p>
<p>But what exactly it means to &#8220;believe on&#8221; Jesus is not clear until chapter four.  Here we need to have the context of the last chapter to understand the response of the pharisees.  The pharisees hear that Jesus is &#8220;gaining disciples&#8221; and &#8220;when Jesus learned of this, he left Judea and went back once more to Galilee.&#8221;  First of all, we must understand that the text does not tell us why Jesus left.  We don&#8217;t know if he had a fight or what.  All we know is that it was a result of the pharisees <em>attitude </em>that Jesus left. </p>
<p>And the place that Jesus goes next is very important to the understanding of this passage as a unit.  He goes to Samaria, the place where God isn&#8217;t supposed to work, a place where the half breeds lived.  And what happens?  Jesus tells them that it is not about the Jews, it is about worshipping God &#8220;in spirit and in truth.&#8221;  In other words, the Kingdom of God is now opened to all in &#8220;spirit and in truth.&#8221;  No longer is it just open to the Jews, but to those like John and the Samaritan woman who believe that Jesus&#8217; way of life is significant and powerful enough for living life now. </p>
<p>Jesus contines by talking to his disciples who are confused because he is talking to a woman.  Jesus exclaims that his &#8220;food is to do the will of him who sent&#8221; him.  That is, to collect the harvest &#8221;for eternal life.&#8221;  And notice also that it states the &#8220;Samariatians from the town believed in him because o fthe woman&#8217;s testimony&#8230;we no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves and we know that this man really is the savior of the world.&#8221;  Never did they say anything about sins, about being forgiven from sins or anything of the like.  It is because I do not believe this confession of faith is as central as many Christians have made it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dkam136.com/2005/12/22/reading-passages-out-of-context/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
